logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.21 2014가합23114
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties, A, and C were the insurance solicitors of the Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”), and the employees of the trustee company entrusted with the work to dispatch the site from the Defendant Samsung Fire to the traffic accident scene, and Eul worked as the employees of the Defendant Samsung Fire Investigation Team.

B. Defendant C’s statement to the Plaintiffs and investigation agency 1) The Defendant D’s statement that “The Plaintiff-friendly job F, while driving a G vehicle on the new wall on March 11, 2012, did not board the said vehicle in relation to the traffic accident that occurred from the access road to H apartment at the Gongju City (hereinafter “instant accident”) while driving the G vehicle on March 11, 2012, the Plaintiff B did not board the said vehicle, and only the Plaintiff A was on board, but did not handle the accident as if he was on board the vehicle with the Plaintiff.” (hereinafter “instant report”).

(2) On April 9, 2012, Defendant D sent the same content to E through I, who is the person in charge of compensation for Defendant Samsung Fire, and Defendant D received delegation from Defendant Samsung Fire and received the authority from Defendant Samsung Fire, and Defendant D filed a petition with the Public Police Station for the crime of “The instant accident occurred while Plaintiff A driven G vehicle on or around 03:00 on March 11, 2012, and the Plaintiffs were aware of the said traffic accident, and as Plaintiff B was on board the said vehicle, they received insurance money from the Plaintiff’s medical treatment and agreement amount of KRW 1,535,340 from Defendant Samsung Fire and acquired it by fraud” (hereinafter “instant petition”).

3) According to the instant petition, an investigation into the Plaintiffs was initiated, and E, Defendant C, and D appeared at the Official Police Station as a witness for the instant case, and the gist of the statement is as follows (hereinafter the following summary of each statement is referred to as “the content of the instant statement”).

(a) (a) E (i) . the Plaintiff.

arrow