1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and such reasoning is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for correction as follows.

2. The portion to be corrected is 3 pages; and

Around February 2015, the Plaintiff received KRW 9,900,000 from Samsung Fire, and the Defendant also received KRW 100,000 from the Defendant on April 13, 2015.

The defendant shall be corrected to “the defendant” as “the defendant.”

The testimony of the witness F is insufficient to recognize it only by the testimony of the witness F, and the testimony of the witness F (hereinafter “the purport that the witness F, before and after the preparation of the above agreement, currency was made in addition to E and the above KRW 10,000,000) on the part of the plaintiff, is difficult to believe it as it is, and if the purport of the agreement was true, it is difficult to conclude that the agreement was made by the defendant's deception solely on the fact that there was such currency. In particular, the limit of the compensation liability insurance for the owner of the facility who is the policyholder, and the plaintiff was paid the total amount of KRW 10,00,000 for each person, and the amount of KRW 10,00,000 to the plaintiff was received from Samsung Fire, but it is difficult to find the reason that E, as alleged by the plaintiff, should have received the agreement from the plaintiff by actively deceiving the defendant for the defendant who was the person responsible for the compensation of Samsung Fire, as the policyholder.”

3. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed as unlawful.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.