Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the department in the chapter E of the public non-regular labor union, and Defendant B is the head of the F Hospital branch of the public non-regular labor union, and Defendant C is the service provider (ju) employee of the service company who performs patient transfer duties at the victim F Hospital.

around September 30, 2015, the Defendants thought that Defendant C would exercise the pressure by conducting an assembly or demonstration before the F Hospital in order to reinstate Defendant C, who did not re-contract after termination of the (State)G and labor view.

이에 피고인들은 다른 노조원들과 함께 2015. 10. 1. 경부터 같은 달 14. 경까지 성남시 분당구 H 소재 F 병원 로비 입구, 복도 등지에서, 사실은 F 병원이 피고인 C를 해고하거나 해고하는데 관여한 사실이 없음에도 불구하고, 마치 F 병원이 피고인 C를 해고하거나 해고에 관여한 것처럼 그 곳을 찾는 불특정 다수를 상대로 ‘ 용역 근로자 해고 통보!! 이것이 F 병원의 환자중심 경영입니까

The term “a hospital” or “a hospital,” carrying out a demonstration or presented relief by carrying out a ticket stating the content of “the withdrawal of unfair dismissal, the guarantee of succession to employment,” etc.

As a result, the Defendants conspired, thereby impairing the reputation of the F Hospital of the victimized person by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of a demonstration site;

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. To reduce part of the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order by taking into account the fact that the Defendants made confessions and reflects the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the circumstances considered, etc.