logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.03.09 2015고단3837
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the F Hospital in Ansan-si, Seosan-si, and Defendant B is the chief of the general affairs division of the foregoing hospital, and Defendant G is a person who concludes an entrustment contract with the above hospital and operates the restaurant of the hospital at the above hospital.

The Defendants concluded an entrustment contract for the restaurant of a hospital (B) and concluded an entrustment contract for the restaurant of a hospital with G on June 1, 2013, and concluded an entrustment contract for the restaurant of a hospital with G and the hospital on June 1, 2013, the Defendants received KRW 80 million from the personal account under the name of the Defendant B, not the hospital operating funds, and prepared a loan certificate for the above KRW 80 million to G. However, the Defendants concluded an agreement to pay G the amount calculated by deducting the personnel expenses for dietitians, cooks, etc., four premiums, and the management expenses for the restaurant from the monthly food expenses to pay G.

Nevertheless, on June 1, 2013, the Defendants filed a false report with the National Health Insurance Corporation that directly operated the restaurant of the above hospital at the above hospital, and received KRW 24,062,930 in total as additional charges, such as receiving additional charges of KRW 7,700, KRW 7,000, KRW 7,000, KRW 8,680, and KRW 23,380, as stated in the list of crimes attached hereto, from December 25, 2013 to December 25, 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to receive property from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of each prosecutor's office concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (verification of earnings under the name of the founder of a hospital);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the Defendants’ selection of penalty)

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. The provisional payment order (the Defendants).

arrow