Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 26, 2016, around 06:30 on July 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the eart D store managed by the Victim B with the entrance to the loading and unloading site following the building, using the cresh in which the employees leave the place; and (b) entered the 2nd floor via the employees’ stairs; and (c) entered the 1,690,000 Samsung Northern Northern (NT90,50L) in the logistics warehouse, which was prepared in advance.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim and stolen the victim's property.
2. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:45, around 06:45, at Empt D stores listed in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that specified in paragraph (1); (b) had 1 Samsung Northern (NT9403L) equivalent to the market price of KRW 2,090,000.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim and stolen the victim's property.
3. On July 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:04, at Empt D stores listed in paragraph (1) up to 06:04, up to 1,140,000 of the market price and 1,590,000 of the market price and 1,590,000 of the Nompt (NT90,003L).
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim and stolen the victim's property.
4. On July 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:25, around 06:25, at Empt D stores listed in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that specified in paragraph (1); (b) had 1 Samsung Northern (NT9403L) equivalent to the market price of KRW 2,090,000.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim and stolen the victim's property.
5. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 06:25, around 06:25, at the mapt D store as described in paragraph (1) in the same manner as that set forth in paragraph (1); (b) had one Samsung Northern (NT50R-Z77L) equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,760,000.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the structure managed by the victim and stolen the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning B;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;
1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting a crime and the choice of punishment, respectively, Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of larceny and the choice of imprisonment);