1. On November 24, 2013, with respect to accidents arising from the Embrypt D points as one of the raw water sources located in Embrypt C around 18:14.

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be judged together.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The basis for the recognition of the responsibility lies in the following: (i) the Defendant (Ears, Credits) established in the store located in the store located in the Geart D store of the Plaintiff, one of the water sources located in the Geart D store operated by the Plaintiff, around November 24, 2013 (hereinafter “this case’s ice work”).

) By using the 3rd floor, those coming down in the direction of the 2nd floor, which were cut down on the ice workshop and were sitting down (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant reported a ice movement. (2) At the time of the instant accident, the instant ice shoot was not only in the state where the floor was sleeped, but also in the state where the slope was walked, and there was a risk that it could be cut off. Nevertheless, at the time of the instant accident, there was no warning sign, etc. indicating such risk at all. The Plaintiff attached a warning sign, etc., i.e., a red sign on the side surface of the instant ice workshop as soon as possible on the side surface after the instant accident occurred. (3) On December 13, 2013, the Defendant was under the diagnosis of the F Hospital operated by the Defendant Intervenor on December 13, 2013, under the name of “the front slick fever and glass, which is the front slick and the front slick. Even after the instant accident, the Defendant, even after its occurrence, did not have a humbromatic sculous sium.

) As a result of the examination and treatment conducted at the hospital, the “Seng-gun of a collision with an annual installments system” and “scarcity of a chronic scarcity” were diagnosed on July 4, 2014, and on July 4, 2014, the Sves Hospital was administered with “consecting anti-scarcitys and anti-scarbing anti-scarcitys” (based on recognition). [In the absence of any dispute, Party A’s statements, evidence Nos. 1 and 2, evidence Nos. 4 and 38 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings, the instant ice work is conducted.