1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The fact that the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

First, the plaintiff asserts that there is a proximate causal relationship between the negligence and the death of the deceased, on the premise that the deceased's private person is "the Hemical shock" and that the medical team at the defendant hospital was negligent in failing to perform the treatment of anti-biotics valid as a result of the blood equality test on the hemal transfusion.

However, considering the overall purport of the arguments as a result of each reply given by the President of the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency on the written evidence No. 3, No. 4, No. 1, and No. 2 (Death Certificate) and the written evidence No. 2 (Death Certificate), it is reasonable to view that the deceased died to the "low-blood shock" by the above Minister-out transfusion, rather than the (large-scale shock) shock.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion based on the premise that the deceased died as "patch shock" is without merit without any further examination.

{피고 병원이 망인에 대해 패혈증에 대한 혈액균배양검사를 미실시한 사실은 피고도 다투지 않으나, 앞서 본 증거에 의하면 망인의 염증이나 폐렴은 피고 병원의 항생제 투약 조치로 오히려 호전 중이었음을 알 수 있는바 2015. 3. 31. 내원 당시 검사한 염증성 생체 표지자인 CRP(C-reactive protein, C반응성단백) 수치는 32.52mg /㎗이었으나, 2015. 4. 4. 검사에서 10.78mg /㎗로 호전되었다. 또한 2015. 4. 4. 재실시한 흉부 엑스레이 검사를 통해서도 폐렴의 호전이 있음을 알 수 있다. , 사정이 이와 같다면 설령 피고 병원 의료진의 (패혈증에 대한) 혈액균배양검사 미실시를 과실로 평가할 수 있다고 하더라도 이것이 망인의 사망과는 상당인과관계가 있다고 볼 수 없다}. 다음으로 원고는, 망인에게 2015. 4. 3...