A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 02:54 on January 27, 2018, referred to as “D main points” in the operation of the Victim C (A) located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Sinpo-si on the ground that the Defendant said that the Defendant “the victim gets the same alcohol,” and said that “I am the victim’s desire to do so,” and that “I d Ga.” to the customers who were seated on another test, and that the victim would be “I am the same year. I am the victim. I am the inside of the Republic of Korea. I am the victim. I am the victim.

For about 30 minutes, such as “a sound” and “a noise”, the victim’s main business operation was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the circumstances that are unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, such as the protection observation and attendance order, namely, the fact that a number of offenses, including the same criminal records, had been sentenced to suspended sentence, suspended sentence, and fines, and that they again lead to the instant crime, that is, the circumstances favorable to the fact that a female has cancelled the complaint against the Defendant by mutual consent with the victim, that is, the recognition of mistake and its depth against the Defendant, and the motive, means and result leading to the instant crime, and other factors of sentencing, such as the motive, means and consequence leading up to the instant crime, the