beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,625,048 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from June 1, 2010 to October 23, 2014.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant’s franchise on June 1, 2010 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”)
A person who has driven a taxi, and the defendant is D-si (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant taxi").
(2) On June 1, 2010, the Defendant, while driving a Pton in the Roukdong-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle at low speed on the ground that the Plaintiff was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle at low speed, was taking a bath to the Plaintiff, and going forward the Plaintiff’s position.
Accordingly, after gathering juice disease by the defendant driving away from the defendant's taxi, the plaintiff set off the defendant's taxi with his own vehicle by blocking the defendant's taxi, and then, he laid down his hand from the plaintiff's vehicle to the defendant's taxi in front of the defendant's taxi in front of the defendant's taxi and putting the defendant's shoulder.
The Defendant: (a) falped the Plaintiff’s falp and falped the chest; (b) the Plaintiff and the Defendant cut the Plaintiff’s finger by hand; (c) the Plaintiff and the Defendant were salped to the other party’s finger; (d) the Plaintiff salpeded the Plaintiff’s finger; (b) the Defendant salpeded the Plaintiff’s finger; (c) the Plaintiff suffered an injury at the right side side of 35 days for which treatment is required between approximately 14 days; and (d) the Defendant suffered an injury at around 14 days, salpinum, salp, salpum, and salp.
3) On November 22, 2010, Seoul Western District Court Decision 2010Da14649, all of the above facts constituting a crime, was prosecuted for the crime of injury, and a summary order was issued to the Plaintiff, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 for the Plaintiff, and a fine of KRW 2,00,000 for the Defendant. As to this, the Defendant did not request a formal trial and the above summary order became final and conclusive on the ground that the Defendant did not request a formal trial, but the injury of Seoul Western District Court 201Ma176 for the Plaintiff, which was pending after filing a request for formal trial, (in the case of modified crime of violence, the Defendant was present and testified in the court as a witness of the above case.