1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiffs and the defendant are the members of the D church located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the plaintiff A is the head of the office in charge of accounting, the plaintiff B is the director in charge of finance, and the defendant. 2) The defendant, who completed a course from the second floor of Diplomatic Association on October 18, 2015, where the conflict with the plaintiffs was reached with the plaintiffs, and asked the plaintiff A, who started a course on the second floor of Diplomatic Association, to "at least 15:50, in which the conflict was reached with the plaintiffs," who was refused, led the plaintiff to take a hand, and the plaintiff A was fluored with the plaintiff's finger by blocking the plaintiff A and fluoring the chest by his hand, and the plaintiff B, who was witnessed, was the defendant of the defendant of the kind B, and the plaintiff B, who left the part of B, and caused the plaintiff to wear the plaintiff's dust.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the Plaintiff A, such as acute climatic salt, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment, and suffered injury on the Plaintiff B, such as climatic salt, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

3) The Defendant filed a summary order with Seoul Western District Court No. 2016 High Court No. 201282, and was brought to a formal trial with the same court No. 2016 High Court No. 4666, and was convicted of having been sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 by the court on November 29, 2016. The Defendant appealed with the same court No. 201759, but the appeal was dismissed on February 16, 2017 and the judgment was finalized on business. [In the absence of any dispute over recognition, the Defendant’s ground for appeal No. 1, 2, 2, 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole, the entire purport of the pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by assault, unless there are any particular circumstances.

C. As to the Defendant’s assertion of 1 king, the Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s assertion is a sking, not by assault, and all the injury suffered by the Plaintiff A was caused by a sking, and the Defendant is not liable for the occurrence of the injury or determined the amount of the damage.