Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is operating a cartoon room in the name of "D" in Kimhae-si C and the second floor of "D."

No one shall provide game products for distribution or use, or display or keep them for such purposes, which have not been rated by the Game Products Management Committee, and shall arrange exchange or exchange or repurchase the tangible or intangible results obtained through the game products as a business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. From January 1, 2015 to April 18:20 from January 1, 2015, to April 1, 2015, 2015, by remodeling the three-story vacant rooms of the above building, and by installing five-story game equipment for the "Physical master" and three-dimensional games for the emotional game room in which no rating has been obtained from the Game Management Committee, provide customers with a cartoon room for their cartoon rooms;

2. The game machine was provided to customers for their use at the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and was exchanged in such a way that customers pay 10,000 won in cash per 500 points.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 (the point of providing game products not rated), 44 (1) 2, and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the point of providing game products not rated), the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime period of this case, including the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime, even though the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order had a record of being sentenced to a fine.