logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.18 2014나44502
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff around 03:00 on March 20, 2007, " around 03:00 on February 5, 2006, the plaintiff abused the victim B and C, and inflicted two full-time injury on them, and damaged the Handphone owned C," and the summary order was requested due to the crime of causing property damage, and on March 30, 2007, the plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Busan District Court's branch branch (No. 3244), and the above summary order was finalized on April 14, 2007.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant investigation records”) b. the investigation records of the instant criminal case

On August 31, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a copy of investigation records of the instant investigation records. However, on September 7, 2010, the Defendant permitted the Plaintiff’s above application to copy only the written opinion among the investigation records of the instant case and rejected all remainder. The Plaintiff again rejected the Plaintiff’s request for disclosure of information with the same content as the second one on October 20, 2010.

C. On May 23, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with the Busan District Court seeking the revocation of the disposition of non-permission to disclose the information (201Guhap2539). On April 19, 2013, the Busan High Court, which was the appellate court, rendered a judgment revoking the disposition of non-permission to disclose the information on the part (hereinafter “information disclosure part of this case”), excluding the information on the victim’s written statement of the investigation records of this case and the personal information in the written injury diagnosis (hereinafter “information disclosure part”), and the judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive on August 19, 2013 by the Supreme Court.

hereinafter referred to as "the administrative litigation of this case"

(D) The Defendant sent a copy, etc. of part of the investigation records of this case to the Plaintiff with the registration on October 25, 2013 and January 16, 2014. [In the meantime, each entry in the evidence No. 1, No. 4, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7, and the purport of the entire pleadings]

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion was excluded from the victims' personal information among the investigation records of this case.

arrow