1. The Defendants are listed in the attached Form, which the Plaintiff posted on the sharing bulletin board established in Dongjak-gu Seoul apartment.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties is that the Plaintiff is the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex B (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) Defendant B’s council of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter “Defendant’s council”) refers to the owner of the instant apartment, the person representing the owner of the instant apartment, and the lessee, etc. of the instant apartment.

(see Article 2 (1) 5 through 7 of the Multi-Family Housing Management Act; hereinafter the same shall apply).

For the purpose of determining important matters concerning the management of the apartment of this case, it is an autonomous resolution body.

3) Defendant DworkM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant DworkM”)

(B) The Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives selected as the housing management operator of the instant apartment as the Defendant’s council and decided to have the management company of the instant apartment. (b) The Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives held a meeting on May 20, 2016, at the time of expiration of the entrusted management contract with the Defendant LworkM, which is the existing housing management operator of the instant apartment, to conclude a re-entrusted management contract with the Defendant LworkM for three years from August 1, 2016 to July 31, 2019. Accordingly, the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives decided to strongly demand the reduction of management expenses through the reduction of fees (26.3%) on the bulletin board, etc. of the instant apartment. Accordingly, the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives decided to re-contract with the aforementioned contents as above, and the occupants, etc. who have an objection to the renewal of the contract with the Defendant’s housing management operator from May 21, 2016 to May 30, 2016.