logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.02.04 2015고정607
식품위생법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person shall manufacture, import, process, use, cook, prepare, or preserve foods or additives, the standards and specifications of which are determined by the Food Sanitation Act, and no person shall sell foods or additives that do not meet such standards and specifications, or manufacture, import, process, use, cook, keep, or display such foods or additives for sale.

Nevertheless, on May 2015, the Defendant cultivated a total of 80 mg/km (10 km per 10 mg/km) remaining pentb in the Donyang Agricultural and Fishery Products Market in order to cultivate a total of 80 mg/km remaining in the Donyang Agricultural and Fishery Products Market in excess of 0.05 (mg/km) that is the remainder of the pentbol pesticide in D with respect to other agricultural products set forth in the food code in front of the dwelling place of the Defendant branch located in the Handong-gun-dong, Hannam-gun, Handong-gun (10 kg per 1 mbam).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Status of inappropriate agricultural product inspection results;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Articles 95 subparag. 1 and 97 subparag. 4 of the Food Sanitation Act that choose a sentence, and the choice of a fine (it is not good to the nature of the crime of this case, but is the first offender who has no record of crime, and is relatively old, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow