logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.05 2011가합79093
하자보수금 등
Text

1. Attached Form among the lawsuits of plaintiffs (appointed parties);

2. The sequence 13, 1431, 1467 of “the review of status of the Plaintiff, etc.”

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Attached Form 1 of the Party’s Status

1. The plaintiffs (appointed parties), the designated parties, the plaintiffs, and the succeeding intervenors (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the plaintiff et al.") indicated in the list of "the plaintiff et al." are some sectional owners among the 67-dong 4,256 households, including all the above apartment complexes, when the apartment complexes are specified for each of the above complexes.

2) Defendant Barun Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Barun Construction”)

2) Defendant C&O and Defendant C&O Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C&O”)

(2) On June 30, 2003, the Seoul Metropolitan City Mayor of Daegu, to build the apartment complex of this case, the non-party B Q house reconstruction and rearrangement project association (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party B Q house reconstruction and rearrangement project

In addition, the project owner who constructed and sold the above apartment after obtaining the final approval under the former Housing Construction Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 6916 of May 29, 2003) (the defendant is only the construction company that performed the construction work of this case by being awarded a contract with the association of the non-party. However, as seen in paragraph (4), the above assertion is without merit.

2) The Defendants entered into a contract for construction of the instant apartment complex with the non-party union and the BP reconstruction project, and began construction of the instant apartment complex from September 2003. The Defendants, following consultation with the non-party union, decided that the apartment complex 1, 2, and 3 was the Defendant Hosung Industries, and the 4, and 5 complexes were each built.

2) After that, the Defendants constructed each of the instant apartment buildings and received a pre-use inspection on the instant apartment from the Daegu Metropolitan City Mayor on July 31, 2006, and sold the instant apartment to the Plaintiff, etc. with the Nonparty Cooperatives. (C) The occurrence of defects and the claim for the repair thereof are as follows.

arrow