1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 350,552,275 and KRW 201,00,000 among those amounts, Defendant Barun Construction Co., Ltd.:

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the party 1) The five A Apartment-dong 317 households in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

In order to manage, the council of occupants' representatives is the council of occupants' representatives composed of occupants, and the non-party C-Japan Housing Reconstruction Project Association (hereinafter "the reconstruction association of this case").

(2) Defendant Barun Construction is a company that constructed and sold the instant apartment, and Defendant Barun Construction is a company that constructed the instant apartment after being awarded a contract for construction works on the instant apartment, and Defendant Barun has guaranteed Defendant Barun Construction’s duty to repair the defects of the instant apartment.

B. On July 1, 2010, the Defendant Guarantee Corporation, which entered into a contract for the repair of defects, shall appoint the guarantee creditor as the head of Yangcheon-gu with respect to the apartment of this case as to Defendant Barun Construction and the instant apartment as the guarantee creditor, and shall enter into each contract for the repair of defects (hereinafter “each of the instant guarantee contracts”) as listed below, and if individually named, it shall enter into the instant guarantee contract in

The guaranty creditor of each of the instant guarantee contracts was changed to the Plaintiff. The guaranty creditor of the instant guarantee contracts was changed to the Plaintiff. The guaranty creditor of the instant guarantee contracts from July 23, 2010 to July 22, 2013 from July 22, 2013 to July 22, 2013 (the base) 595,537,326 E 2 E from July 23, 2010 to July 22, 2015 (5j) 297,768,663 F. 3F from July 23, 2010 to July 22, 2015 (10th).

C. The instant apartment was inspected on July 22, 201 for the pre-use inspection and defect of the instant apartment.

On the other hand, the part of the apartment construction to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing was not constructed while the apartment building of this case was newly constructed, or the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing was defective or operated differently from the design drawing, and there was a defect such as rupture and water leakage in the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the apartment of this case (hereinafter “each defect of this case”) and the apartment of this case as a result of the defect warranty liability period if it is individually referred to according to each defect warranty period.