beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and for a defendant B, for six months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On November 2, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on March 1, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 1, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
2013 highest order 2649
1. The Defendants’ fraud against the victim E is the F representative director, Defendant A is the F General Director, and the Defendants established F to enter into a sales consignment management contract with G Chungcheong Total Site I, and conspired to acquire the security money upon entering into a sales consignment contract with the victim E when the management status becomes worse, such as the enemy’s occurrence while operating I stores, etc.
Defendant
A around October 19, 2010, at the 5th floor F office of Pyeongtaek-si, Inc. in Pyeongtaek-si J, the victim stated to the effect that “F is a company with the H Gyeonggi-do’s general sales right and provided a security of KRW 00 million and cash to H main office and operated a mobile phone, and has several agencies, opening rooms, and sales stores, and Seoul also has the SK places of business, and one of them will be entrusted with the I operation of the Pyeongtaek-si store.”
However, in fact, F does not have the H-do total sales right, and F did not have the authority to entrust the I sales management to the victim because it did not have the authority to entrust the I sales management because it did not have the authority to entrust it to the victim because it was the reason for the termination of the contract of the G Cheong-gun
As above, the Defendants: (a) deceiving the victim; (b) concluded an entrusted operation agreement with the victim; and (c) transferred KRW 30 million to the account in the name of a corporate bank in the name of the Defendant B as a deposit money around October 20, 2010.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.
404 highestest 4034
2. Defendant A’s fraud, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of a falsified document shall operate F, which is an agent of mobile phones, and L and mobile phone sales stores.