logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.10.16 2014가단122761
매매대금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 23,00,000 (each of KRW 11,500,000) to the Plaintiffs; and (b) to October 14, 2014 to October 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs leased 2nd floor of the building located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and operated Epic book (hereinafter “the instant watch room”) as a partnership business. The defendant, under the trade name of F, runs a business in which the content of analysis of real estate wholesalers, images or photographs are published in the site that he operates and manages, and receives compensation.

B. On January 2, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a consulting agreement with the Defendant on the content of analysis and image or photograph of the instant room and publish it on the website of the Defendant’s operation to pay 2.4 million won (1.4 million won on the day of the contract, 1.4 million won on the day of the contract, and one million won after the sale) in return for selling the instant room to KRW 200 million (30 million on the leased deposit, premium 170 million on the premium).

According to the above consulting contract, the Defendant produced photographs and videos of the instant video room, and published them on the Defendant’s website along with information on the objects of sale (the premium of KRW 170 million, the lease deposit of KRW 30 million, the monthly rent of KRW 2350,000).

C. The Plaintiffs, on April 21, 2014, concluded an exchange contract with the 100 period of Charnel Charnel, which was difficult to sell in cash the instant reeds. On April 21, 2014, the Plaintiffs prepared a power of attorney on the transfer of the name of the exchange contract and Charnel Charnel, and the Defendant, within a week after concluding the exchange contract, sold the 20 period of Charnel as 2 million won per each month (which shall be adjusted to 10 to 20%) and paid the price. If the purchase is not made within one week after the exchange contract, he/she prepared a written confirmation to the effect that the Defendant will make the cash payment first.

On May 1, 2014, a lease contract was concluded between G and building owners who agreed to take over the instant bank, and the exchange contract was concluded between the Plaintiffs and G, and the Plaintiffs paid one million won the remainder of fees under the said consulting contract to the Defendant.

E. The Defendant on May 5, 2014

arrow