1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

A. Of the buildings listed in paragraph 2 of the attached Table 1 list, the Attached Table 2 Map 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

1. Basic facts

가. 피고는 2012. 11. 2.경 별지1 목록 제2항 기재 건물의 소유자이던 E와 사이에, 피고가 E로부터 위 건물 중 일부를 임차보증금 1,000만원, 월 차임 90만원에 임차하는 내용의 임대차계약을 체결하였다가, 2013. 1.경 내지 같은 해 2.경 위 건물 부분을 일부 증축하여 2013. 3.경 별지1 목록 제2항 기재 건물 중 별지2 도면 표시 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 1층 제2종근린생활시설(일반음식점) 82.03㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 임차건물’이라 한다)를 임차보증금 2,000만원, 월 차임 90만원으로 정하여 임차하는 내용의 임대차계약을 체결한 이후 E로부터 이 사건 임차건물을 인도받아 ‘F’이라는 상호로 주점을 운영하여 왔다.

B. On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiffs acquired ownership by completing the registration of ownership transfer on March 26, 2014 with respect to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1/2 from E as to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

C. On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, setting the lease deposit of KRW 30 million for the instant leased building, KRW 1.8 million for monthly rent (excluding value-added tax), and the lease period from April 22, 2014 to April 21, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and the Defendant continued to operate the main points in the instant leased building thereafter.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 38, Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 5, and 20 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. On the premise that the instant lease contract was renewed after April 21, 2016, the expiration date of the lease term, the Plaintiffs delayed for at least three years, on the premise that the Defendant was renewed. The Plaintiffs were around the instant leased building.