The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 21:26, Apr. 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stolen one of the DNA owners located in the display stand in the 1st floor of the building B in the Suwon-si District (hereinafter “instant C c c c c c c c c c sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sp sps

B. In the above date, at the above time and place, the injured Defendant attempted to see the victim's eating of bread as stated in the above paragraph (a), and tried to leave the place, and the victim's right chest was at the price of the victim's left hand, and the victim's head, neck, breast part, etc. was pushed down by hand and carried out two weeks of the head, neck, breast part, etc. with his hand, thereby causing injury to the right dump, etc. which requires two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal procedure of judgment on larceny, the evidence that there is a criminal fact must be presented by the prosecutor. Even if the defendant's appeal is unreasonable and the defendant's appeal is false, it cannot be disadvantageous to the defendant. The proof of the criminal fact should have the judge have high probability to recognize it to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to form a conviction to this extent, it is doubtful that the defendant is guilty.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Do163 Decided November 30, 2007, etc.). In light of the above legal principles, comprehensively taking account of each of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts are acknowledged: (a) the Defendant took one of five of the five of the items of the facts charged, as described in paragraph (a).

On the other hand, the defendant and his defense counsel thought that the Climbolol in this case, which the defendant had been placed, was provided for food, and they turned out as such.