logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.11.11 2015고단2350
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:00 on September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, on the grounds that services are not good at the restaurant for the operation of the victim D in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as having the customer who had the meals go out of the restaurant, who had caused the disturbance to go out of the restaurant.

2. At around 17:05 on September 20, 2015, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties stated in the foregoing Paragraph (1) that “F, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station E District, dispatched upon receipt of the 112 report, asked the circumstances of the case to be asked.” The Defendant expressed a desire to “I see how I am why I am the president and talk. I am see how I am am am. I am am bound by you am. I am. I am am. I am am. I am am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am on the left side of the D’s face at one time, and interfere with F’s legitimate execution of duties concerning public security and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the sentencing guidelines are not set as to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in the basic area (from June to April) of category I (the scope of recommending punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommending punishment for the crime of obstruction of official duties), and Article 37 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the crime of obstruction of official duties) (the crime of obstruction of official duties) (the decision of sentence) (the defendant is sentenced] on December 18, 2013, who was sentenced by the Central District Court of the Government on December 18, 2013 to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and two years of suspended execution, and the above decision became final and conclusive on December 27, 2013, and each of the crimes of obstruction of official duties in this case, even during the period of

arrow