logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.08.07 2012고정114
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the head of the “D Hospital” located in the second floor in North Korea-gu, North Korea-gu, and the Defendant is a person in charge of the operation of the hospital, such as treatment of patients, surgery, decision on admission and discharge, confirmation of admission and discharge, and issuance of a medical certificate.

D hospital operated by the defendant is a hospital specializing in treatment and surgery of non-pocks, and is using the rash marcule (EVLT) and the maVL method, etc.

The operation through the above method is a non-benefit item that is not included in the subject of insurance benefits of the National Health Insurance Corporation, and individually purchases an accident insurance for private insurance companies, and hospitalization after the operation shall be made, but 30 to 100% of the medical expenses to be borne by the patient himself/herself according to the terms and conditions of the non-life insurance for private insurance companies.

However, in general, Rayer, Macing (EVT)-based treatment is owned by 30 minutes to 1 hour, and continuous observation and treatment of doctors such as medication is not required, and it is not necessary to be hospitalized to immediately discharge the patient after taking stability in the recovery room after the procedure. However, despite the fact that the Defendant issued a certificate of hospitalization and discharge so that patients can receive insurance money from private insurance companies, he/she is able to attract patients and make profits and explain the methods of confirming the purchase of insurance by patients who provide consultation and explain the method of receiving insurance money even without being hospitalized, and then mutually cooperate with the patients so that they can receive insurance money by issuing it to the patients.

On March 16, 2010, the criminal defendant against a private insurance company had the surgery patient E from around 14:00 to around 2 hours from the above hospital, and did not return home to the relationship in which the patient resides in the long distance.

arrow