The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the court below acquitted the victim of the facts charged in this case on the ground that the defendant's statement, diagnosis, cell phone image, and other evidences submitted by the prosecutor were found to have caused the victim to suffer bodily injury by pushing the victim in his hand. The court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case.

2. The lower court determined as follows based on the evidence duly adopted and examined: (a) the situation at the time of the instant case was recorded on the cell phone of the Defendant’s female-friendly job offering D; (b) it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant’s sale was a face-to-face; and (c) if the Defendant’s sale in the video is very rapid, it does not seem that the victim, who suffered such harmful act from the Defendant with a strong body, merely caused damage to the site or its surrounding area by the victim who was exposed to such harmful act by the Defendant at a very rapid speed of the Defendant’s selling in the video, does not appear to have suffered from the victim’s hard-to-face or knee, etc., even if the victim was sealed by 30 persons, and it is difficult to view that the victim was in contact with the victim’s hard-to-face-to-face hne, etc., and that the victim was in contact with the victim’s hard-to-face-to-face hne, unlike the victim’s aforementioned video recording and video.