The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that it is difficult to view the image of the parking lot continuously without any omitted time in the first CCTV video (CHNNL 07 CCTV screen) of the instant parking lot as a part of the following: (a) it is difficult to view that a person who can take care of his body in the side near the driver’s seat and the rear seat near the victim’s seat is the defendant; and (b) it cannot be concluded that a person who can take care of his body in the front and rear seat is the defendant; (c) it is not only the first CCTV screen but also the second CCTV screen (CHNNNL 08 CCTV screen), and even the second CCTV screen (NNNL 08 CCTV screen), the route that the defendant parked in the instant parking lot and moves to the entrance of the elevator is not continuously taken, and therefore, it is unlawful to find the facts charged by the lower court guilty on the ground of the CCTV video.

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, i.e., the following circumstances, i.e., ① the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle entering the parking lot; the front side of the victim’s vehicle entering the parking lot; the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle entering the front side of the victim’s vehicle; the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle entering the front side of the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle; the male who has been parked in the front side of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle; and the front side of the driver’s seat and the left side side of the victim’s vehicle leaving the front side (the front side seems to be moving by the vehicle’s attitude to lower the victim’s seat); the front side is parked in the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle after entering the parking lot; and the front side of the front screen is parked by the driver’s vehicle moving the front side of the Defendant’s mountain pet vehicle.