logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고정134
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The indictment does not specify the criminal records falling under the single concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Code, but it is stated ex officio. Thus, there is no difficulty in exercising the defendant's right of defense.

On December 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in relation to assistance in Ansan-do, the method of Suwon-do, and on May 23, 2016, the judgment became final and conclusive (the Defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance court, but the Defendant was sentenced to dismissal of appeal at the Suwon-do, which was declared by the Suwon-do, on March 25, 2016, and the Defendant again appealed on May 23, 2016), and subsequently dismissed the appeal on May 23, 2016) / [criminal facts] No person shall issue a transaction instruction in electronic financial transactions or transfer any access medium used to secure the authenticity and accuracy of the user and the content thereof.

Nevertheless, on March 2014, the Defendant reported an advertisement that provides KRW 700,000 won per head of the Tong, and opened an agricultural cooperative account in the name of the Defendant and the Saemaul Treasury account (C), respectively, and sent the passbook connected to the above account to the non-resident in the office located in the Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Busan, by mail.

on April 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) divorced to the Defendant’s wife, 25 years of age, who is an employee of the main store at around 21:50 on April 24, 2015; (b) the Defendant’s wife at around 201:50 on April 24, 201; (c) the Defendant’s wife at around 25 years of age; and (d) the Defendant

In other words, the victim's face side was taken over several times due to the reason that the couple's side was separated, and the victim's face was unexplodedd, and the victim's face was humpted.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 410"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol of the police statement of G 2016 high-level 571;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The F's statement "Prior Records of Judgment";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the judgment (the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch 2015 High Court's 2506 High Court's 2506 High Court's Suwon District Court.

arrow