logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.09.07 2015고단1195
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 13, 2015, the Defendant entered a residential chip into a living room and intruded the victim’s residence through beca window when the victim B (n, 27 years of age) live during the divorce adjustment period (hereinafter referred to as “the victim”) came to fall under 00 -00 - 000 - from beca window.

2. When the victim reported 112 at a temporary place under the above paragraph (1), the Defendant committed assault by taking the victim’s cell phone equipment away, and then making the victim take the victim’s head from drinking.

3. Special intimidation: (a) the Defendant sent a knife knife, which is a deadly weapon (total length of 31cc and 20cc) brought by the Defendant on the part of the victim, at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, to the effect that “I ambi through E. N. N. N. N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W. They called “I knife, I will knife,” which is a deadly weapon used by the Defendant at the kitchen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. The reasoning for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders is advantageous to the fact that the defendant is the primary offender; however, the crime of this case is committed by intrusion upon a residence even though it is under divorce conciliation, and in knife it is not appropriate to commit such crime; the defendant did not make efforts to recover damage; and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the order.

arrow