logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.06 2015고정3777
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in the business of selling high art works in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name of “D”.

On January 25, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness at the Seoul Western District Court 305, the Seoul Western District Court 305, which was located in 174 as Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and 2014, 1832 E, and 1832.

The Defendant’s “Isknifies that he was stolen from F of the above high-art art product” by the Prosecutor.

“To answer the question “,” but not.

“At the time of carrying things, I did not have any proposal at the time of carrying things.” The prosecutor’s testimony, “I have made a transaction not only with theft but also with “I have made a statement.”

It is believed that the G would bring about the question of “F and G to the point of view that it would be appropriate for F and G to bring these high-art art products to the absence of the witness,” and that “G would bring about it to the public prosecutor.”

“At the time of the witness’s statement in an investigative agency, the counsel’s testimony that “the person who misrepresented F and G find the witness D and the witness did not have the witness, thereby bringing about the National Assembly President of HWE between F and G.

In other words, the lux 1 lux 1 lux lux and 1 lux lux were stolen, and the lux 2 points were brought to the lux lux between the absence of a witness.

I will answer the question "........"

It is said that when the "F," etc. of the testimony," the "F," etc. of the witness's shop brought the above two points to the witness's shop, the witness did not have the witness, and he was the employee of the H.

“To the inquiry,” and the counsel’s “actually was stolen due to the fact that it was possible to return the stolen article with a stolen stolen article.”

Nor is the test of “Irrevied” in the question “Irrevied.”

At the time of its payment, the F did not take place even when the F did not appear.

In the situation at the time, grheat and grix frat, after the frat and the telephone following the frat.

arrow