logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.07.20 2016고단2401
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On January 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for criminal fraud at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 19, 2017.

【Criminal facts at the conference office around October 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, “The Defendant would purchase the cargo vehicle under the name of the Defendant and make an installment with the proceeds of the purchase of the cargo vehicle in the name of the lending company, and then would make the payment with the proceeds of the lending company. If the Defendant lent the name of the lending company, 3 million won per 10% of the priority loan, and the installment shall be responsible for the payment, and if disposing of the cargo vehicle later, she would divide the half of the sales price.”

However, in purchasing cargo vehicles with a loan from the non-party 1 "E", the defendant merely stated that the victim was asked to introduce the person who will lend the name in the purchase of the vehicle, and did not think of the profit by providing a siren while purchasing and managing the vehicle. At that time, there was no adequate revenue to the extent of paying the above installment, or there was no special property, and there was no means of knowing the personal information or contact information of the "E" that the vehicle to be purchased under the name of the victim, and there was a false statement to the effect that the victim would receive the installment properly or pay the installment with the profit, even though there was no means of guaranteeing the actual purchase of the vehicle, so even if the loan was made under the name of the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay it at once.

Nevertheless, on October 25, 2013, the Defendant had the victim obtain a loan of 35 million won from the Aju Capital Co., Ltd. in the name of the victim from the victim on the same day, and the said 35 million won from the victim on the same day is Daegu Bank in the name of F.

arrow