logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단2064
사기등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

Defendant

A's application for compensation is dismissed.

2. The defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 29, 2015.

A. On July 2012, the Defendant, one of the instant frauds, at the G office operated by the victim E in the Seocho-gu Daejeon Daejeon World War, concluded that “The victim imported Hub H2 vehicles in the United States, but the purchaser was not found and the sale was delayed, so it is difficult to borrow the vehicle under his/her own name, and if the Defendant takes over the said vehicle with one capital loan from the four names, he/she will sell it with the profit of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not have a certain income at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay installments even if he was given a loan from the victim in the name of the victim without any particular property.

On July 5, 2012, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) allowed the victim to borrow KRW 40 million from the capital capital in the name of the victim; and (c) on July 21, 2012, the Defendant had the victim pay KRW 1,740,730 on behalf of the victim for the payment of KRW 1,740,730 on July 21, 2012.

B. On August 23, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement with the purport that “45 million won from the social call ( currently KB Capital) our name is 24 months, and the Defendant borrowed 45 million won from the principal and interest repayment method in 2006 FH2 vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “206 vehicle”) to purchase the said vehicle in 2006, 2,244,410 won, monthly payment is liable and paid, and the Defendant would sell the said vehicle.”

However, the defendant did not have a certain income at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay installments even if he was given a loan from the victim in the name of the victim without any particular property.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow