1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted to the court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed legitimate

This court's reasoning is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part written by the court below 2.2. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part written by the court below is 5.7,88 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(a) 2) Part 2 shall be written in the following manner:

“2) The instant lease agreement was terminated on December 31, 2006 due to the expiration of the lease term, or the Plaintiff’s declaration of refusal to renew the lease was lawfully terminated due to the expiration of the lease term on August 27, 2014 or on December 18, 2015, including the Plaintiff’s declaration of refusal to renew the lease.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, a lessor.

"Dro" in the fifth to twenty lines of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to "D". The seventh to twenty-one line of the judgment of the court of first instance (4. 4.) shall be applied to "D".

(b) She shall do so with the following parts:

B. The part of the plaintiff's assertion that the lease contract of this case was terminated due to the expiration of the initial lease term (five years) as to the claim that the lease contract of this case was terminated on January 26, 199, when the plaintiff entered into the lease contract of this case with respect to the real estate of this case, which is the B and publicly constructed rental house on January 26, 199, and set the lease term as five years (the expiration date of the lease term: January 2001, which was the occupancy date, and December 2006, which was five years after the occupancy date), and it is recognized that C and the defendant succeeded to the tenant status of the above lease in sequence with the plaintiff before the expiration of the lease term,

As to this, the defendant asserts to the effect that “the instant lease agreement continues to exist as it is implicitly renewed after the expiration of its initial lease term.”