logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.22 2016나2073918
보험금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants shall be revoked, and the Plaintiffs’ claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The underlying facts and the grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the allegations by the parties are the same as the relevant part of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to the following parts: (a) the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance “the occurrence and result of the accident” is used; and (b) thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

B. The occurrence and result of the accident (1) Plaintiff B, from around 09:00 on September 25, 2013, along with D, his father-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu C apartment complex, hereinafter “the indoor swimming pool of the sports center in the sports complex”, refers to the swimming pool of this case.

(2) The swimming pool of this case was set up within 25 meters in length, and the width is 2.5 meters. (2) At the time, the swimming pool of this case was set up by Plaintiff B, starting in the order of one student each one, going back from and return back, and an instructor went back from the place near the departure point, causing the student’s losses to go back. The swimming pool of this case was set up by 3-4 in the case of swimming training course of the No. 9 a. 3-4 in the case of a swimming course of the No. 9 a. 3-3-4 p.m., which was carried out, and followed other laws suitable for the student’s actual ability, such as the type of go back 1-34 minutes, and immediately after the occurrence of the accident, Plaintiff B prepared for the No. 3-4 minutes campaign from 0900 to 34 minutes on the same day, and followed Plaintiff B-3-34 minutes on the day the accident occurred to go back to and from the bar on the day of this case.

arrow