A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 22:30 on November 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol at “E” main points operated by the Victim D (A, 40 years of age) in the Siljin-si, the Defendant: (b) stated that the Defendant would prevent the Defendant from getting the Victim’s “as the Defendant took a large amount of alcohol,” and said, on the ground that “the Defendant would have caused the Victim to get the Victim to get the Victim’s alcohol,” he said that “the Victim would have taken a large amount of alcohol,” and said, on the hand, the Defendant sawd the Victim’s head, and caused the Victim’s knife with her head, thereby causing approximately 10 days of treatment.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, as stated in paragraph 1 at the time, place, such as the date and time as stated in paragraph 1, carried one fluorous alcoholic beverage and one fluorous telephone, the market price on which the victim owned by the table, carried one fluor, and continuously carried out smartphones owned by the victim on the floor, and damaged the repair cost to cover approximately KRW 110,000.

3. On November 8, 2014, from around 00:00 to around 00:25, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force, such as: (a) the Defendant: (b) found the Defendant under the influence of alcohol at the places specified in paragraph (1) and took golf loans; and (c) putting the wall with the wall, “I would not allow the Defendant to do so by spreading a spath and spath; and (d) having the customers who fright up the spath to go out; and (c) caused the Defendant to go out, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force.

4. The Defendant, in response to the withdrawal request, refused to comply with the request for withdrawal without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested by the police officers and the victims of the relevant police station who were called out after having received a report on his/her failure to return home, as stated in paragraph 3, at the time and place of the entry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D, F and G;

1. Investigation report (on-site exit status, etc.), and photographs at the time of mobilization;

1. 12 reported case handling table, respectively;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a medical certificate of injury, estimate, hospital, mobile phone repair cost receipt;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.