The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for one year, two years of suspended execution, confiscation, and collection) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination is that the defendant continues to conduct business even though he/she was found to have been exposed to the crackdown while engaging in the business of arranging sexual traffic, that the defendant engages in the business of arranging sexual traffic for a considerable period of time while lending several officetels, and that he/she engages in the act of arranging sexual traffic using a medium with high radio wave.

However, the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that there is no record of punishment for the same crime is favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances and motive leading up to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, environment, occupation, etc. and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments and records, there is no change in circumstances to determine the punishment differently from the original judgment, and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Sentencing Committee [the scope of recommending punishment] the aggravated area (one year to three years for imprisonment) of types 2 (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts due to the receipt, payment, etc. of business fees) [the main reasons for acting] increased by advertisement or high radio wave [the grounds for acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts and acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts and acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts by using high radio wave]. There is no positive effect: [the reasons for acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts and acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts by using high radio wave]: The court below's sentence is too unfair, and the prosecutor's above assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.