beta
Text
1. Defendant G: (a) 69,000,000 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 42,00,000 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 41,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 14.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant G
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant G drafted, on January 9, 2016, a cash custody certificate consisting of KRW 10 million for the storage amount on January 9, 2016, and KRW 62 million for the storage amount on April 8, 2016, and paid KRW 3 million among them. (2) Defendant G drafted to Plaintiff B a cash custody certificate consisting of KRW 42 million for the storage amount on April 8, 2016.
3) On January 8, 2016, Defendant G drafted to Plaintiff C a cash custody certificate consisting of KRW 10 million in custody, and KRW 10 million in custody on January 20, 2016, respectively. Defendant G confirmed that (i) he/she borrowed additional money and (ii) he/she had the obligation to borrow KRW 41 million in cash after settling accounts thereof; (iii) Defendant G drafted a cash custody certificate consisting of KRW 10 million in custody with Plaintiff D on January 9, 2016, and (iv) borrowed KRW 4.5 million after preparing the said cash custody certificate.
5) On April 8, 2016, Defendant G drafted a cash custody certificate equivalent to KRW 25 million with the custody amount to Plaintiff E. (6) Defendant G drafted a cash custody certificate equivalent to KRW 10 million with the custody amount to Plaintiff G on January 11, 2016, and borrowed KRW 6 million after the preparation of the cash custody certificate.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, Defendant G is obligated to return each of the loans to the Plaintiffs since it appears that Defendant G borrowed KRW 69,000,000 from Plaintiff A, KRW 42,00,000 from Plaintiff B, KRW 41,00,000 from Plaintiff C, KRW 14,50,000 from Plaintiff D, KRW 25,000,000 from Plaintiff E, and KRW 16,00,000 from Plaintiff F, respectively.
2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant H
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant G borrowed money from the Plaintiffs under the pretext of using it for acquiring a KOSDAQ-listed company, and said, Defendant H’s trust and investment in the Jeju-do land in his/her business relationship with him/her. (2) The Plaintiffs and Defendant G are as follows.