beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, from March 14, 2013, and Defendant C, from March 14, 2013, as well as KRW 55 million.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. In full view of the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties or the following facts; (b) Defendant B asserts that the loan certificate of this case contains the name of the party, but there is no direct entry of the name; and (c) the seal affixed on the name is not used by the party; (d) Defendant B bears the same seal as the loan certificate of this case as the loan certificate of this case; and (e) Defendant B bears the same seal as the loan certificate of this case; and (e) Defendant B bears the same as the name of Defendant B, as the loan certificate of this case, and the signature was written in the same manner as the above loan certificate of this case; and (e) Defendant B bears the following facts, it is acknowledged that the loan certificate of this case is authentic in full view of the purport of the entire arguments of Plaintiff B, as the loan certificate of this case, as the loan certificate of this case was written directly by Defendant B and the signature was not written separately.
1) On February 23, 2007, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 10 million to the network D, the mother of the Defendants, and KRW 7 million on July 16, 2007, to the Plaintiff. At each time, D had the Plaintiff prepare a cash custody certificate or loan certificate. Defendant B signed the said cash custody certificate or loan certificate or affixed his seal on August 10, 2007, with the intent to borrow money with D or guarantee D’s obligation. 2) The Plaintiff lent D with each other on May 25, 2009, KRW 30 million,000,000,000,000 to D, and D with the intent that D borrowed money with the Defendant’s debt guarantee or affixed its signature or seal on the said cash receipt.
On June 7, 2005, the Plaintiff lent KRW 15 million to Defendant C, but the said Defendant, around September 19, 201, paid KRW 10 million to the Plaintiff a new cash custody certificate and issued it to the Plaintiff.
3..