1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 66,500,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 24, 2014 to February 28, 2016.

1. Under the facts found, the following facts are acknowledged among the plaintiff and the defendant A in full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, and there is no reflective evidence, and between the plaintiff and the defendant B, it is deemed that the defendant led to confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The Plaintiff is a government-invested institution that carries out the so-called “lease for Lease of Existing Housing” business that the Plaintiff concludes a lease contract with the status of lessee for the existing housing so that the “minimum income class in the Do” can enjoy stable housing with the present income in the current living zone, and that the Plaintiff is a low-income lessee who wants to provide support.

B. As part of the lease business of the above existing house lease on September 25, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) as part of the lease business of the above existing house lease; (b) as part of the lease business of the above existing house lease; (c) KRW 201-54.63m2 of the multi-household housing owned by Nonparty C (hereinafter “the instant real estate”); (d) KRW 75 million of the lease deposit; (b) KRW 8.5 million of the lease deposit; (c) KRW 8.5 million of the lease deposit; (d) the tenant who will move into the instant real estate in accordance with the foregoing business; and (e) the remainder of KRW 6.5 million of the lease deposit; and (e) from October 30, 2009 to October 29, 201; (e) KRW 201m201,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000.