logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.02 2015노7151
아동복지법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s appellate brief (unfair sentencing) reflects the Defendant’s fault; (b) the Defendant’s life was committed in a timely workplace; and (c) the risk of becoming effective with a suspended sentence, the lower court’s sentence ordering the Defendant to complete a program for sexual assault treatment for eight months or 80 hours is too unreasonable.

2. Each of the crimes of this case, each of the crimes of this case, showing the sex of a female child who was not older than 11, in order for the defendant to meet his or her sexual desire, and “pine”

I am special, we see that we can see that we am special;

It is not good that the Defendant committed a sexual abuse at the same time, which would cause a sense of sexual shame, and at the same time, committed a sexual abuse at the same time. The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five years for a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) at the Seoul High Court on April 25, 2013. The Defendant committed a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media) during the suspended sentence on April 9, 2014, even if he received a fine of three million won from the Suwon Frigwon, considering the motive and circumstance of each of the instant crimes, the degree of damage before and after each of the instant crimes, records of damage, and other circumstances, the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant was not subject to a suspended sentence of five years in consideration of the aforementioned circumstances, such as the motive and circumstances of the crime, the record of harm before and after each of the instant crimes, and the records of character and conduct of the Defendant, as stated in the grounds for appeal.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the lower court’s crime No. 6-7 of the crime committed “sexual abuse and abuse.”

arrow