1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

1. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. The court's explanation concerning this case is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

Except for the following parts, the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment, and such part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Parts of the mix

B. An employer of liability for damages is an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying a labor contract, and is obligated to take necessary measures, such as improving physical environment so that an employee does not harm life, body, or health in the course of providing his/her labor, and is liable to compensate for damages caused by his/her breach of such duty of protection.

(2) Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of oral arguments as seen earlier, the following: (a) the instant accident occurred in the process of collecting a water tank with a weight of about 40 to 50km in a situation where equipment, such as caters, is unable to be used; (b) in the event that sufficient working space is not secured, it is difficult to move a water tank with a weight of at least 40 to 50km in height of 1.8 meters; and (c) it is difficult to move a water tank with a weight of at least 40 to 50km in height to move; and (b) in the process of moving a water tank to the direction above, it is difficult to take measures to protect the body of the deceased, such as the deceased, without any duty to remove the tank in advance, or to remove the tank in a situation where the life of the body of the deceased, such as the body of the body of the deceased, even if the body of the body of the body of the deceased, is in contact with the work tank.