beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million for six months, Defendant C, D, E, and F, respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant B is the head of the field management team belonging to “D” corporation (hereinafter referred to as “D”) located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, the 2016 Highest 3431, and Defendant A is the head of the team at the site management team belonging to “D” (hereinafter referred to as “D”), Defendant A is the head of a group of one half of the frackers belonging to D, and the victim L(37 years) is a person who has worked as the fracker master of D.
Defendant
B, around 11:40 on March 10, 2016, at the work site in Ulsan-gun M in Ulsan-gun, the Defendant A intended to have the Defendant move a string tank (a tank with the weight of approximately 25 tons installed on the deck of a ship) to a string (a equipment with a width of approximately 5 meters used in transporting heavy water within the company, and approximately 21m in length) using a string (a equipment with a strong width of about 21m in transporting heavy water).
1. The Defendants’ occupational department and office
A. Defendant B, as the head of the management team at the place of the work site of the boiler franchise business, was the head of the management team at the place of the business site, and supervised the movement of the boiler tank to the weight-water tank. As such, Defendant B had a duty of care to prevent any accidents that may occur between the transport of the holdr franchise in advance by taking necessary measures to prevent danger, such as checking whether four signal numbers of the holdr franchises are placed in two sides of the holdr franchise in accordance with the work plan, etc.
The Defendant did not take measures to ensure that the damage suffered by the signal receiver does not meet the signals from the perspective of the signal server transpos.
B. Defendant A, as an operator of a mortarr, performed the operation of a motor tank driver in order to move a weight tank as above, and therefore, Defendant A has to grasp the risk factors that may arise from the operation of a herringr in advance by sufficiently examining the surrounding circumstances in advance, and the transport of a herringr.