logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.01.21 2012나10131
채무부존재확인 등
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Plaintiff

AH against the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows, and this part of the basic facts is the same as the “basic facts” stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal or deletion of some contents as follows.

【The part to be removed or removed” in the fourth 19th 19th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court is that “the plaintiffs and the intervenors succeeding to the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiffs”)” are “any person” in the fourth 20th 20th of the judgment of the first instance. The part of “the money indicated in the column for calculation of unjust enrichment” in the fourth 21th 21th 21 of the judgment of the first instance is paid. The part of “the money indicated in the table for calculation of unjust enrichment” in the attached Table 3 (hereinafter referred to as “attached Table 3”) was paid. The part of “the money indicated in the attached Table 3, 8th 1st 5th 1st eth eth eth 6th eth eth eth eth eth eth son eth eth eth son eth eth eth eth son eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.).

3. Determination

A. The court’s explanation on this part of the obligation to return unjust enrichment is set forth in Section 2(A) of the judgment of the first instance court, except for the addition of some of the following.

arrow