1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 10, 1913, the land research division drafted during the Japanese Occupation Period, indicated that N, who has an address in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-gun M, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”) and the 844 square meters prior to P (hereinafter “instant No. 1”) were under the respective circumstances. In addition, the land research division written out during the Japanese Occupation Period, indicated that all of them were under the respective circumstances.

B. Since then, each of the instant lands was registered for the conversion of the area on January 1, 1978, and the change of land category on November 22, 1986, and was registered for ownership registration under the name of the Republic of Korea on April 16, 1996, and each of the said lands was registered for ownership registration under the name of the Republic of Korea on December 26, 2006.

C. N, the Plaintiff’s prior domicile in Q Q, the Dongcheon-gun, died on September 27, 1969, and owned by R, S, and unmarried father at the time, and U, U.S., who was a married father at the time, succeeded to the property according to the statutory share of inheritance.

S died on November 9, 198, and died, and the wife, Plaintiff I, J, and unmarried father G at the time, and Plaintiff H, who had been married at the time, inherited the property according to the statutory share of inheritance.

T In September 26, 1995, upon the death of R, U, and S, the Plaintiff F, G, H, I, I, and J jointly inherited property. The R died on October 7, 1999 and jointly succeeded to the property of Plaintiff F, G, C, D, and E.

U died on September 20, 2006, and on September 20, 2006, the Plaintiff K and L, her husband, had succeeded to the property according to the statutory share of inheritance.

The specific inheritance shares of the plaintiffs are as shown in the annexed share calculation sheet.

The Gyeonggi-do Socheon-gun M was merged with V, W due to the consolidation of administrative districts in 1914, and X-gun of Gyeonggi-do became a Gyeonggi-do.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 4-1, 5, 6-1, 5, and 6-5, and the purport of the whole pleadings as a result of fact inquiry about the head of Gyeonggi-do in this court

2. The summary of the plaintiffs' causes of action is each of the lands of this case.