logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.28 2016고정776
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person of "2016 High 776" shall transfer or take over any access medium used in electronic financial transactions.

On April 22, 2014, around April 23, 2014, the Defendant established the “B Limited Partnership Company” with the Defendant as the representative director, and opened three accounts, including the National Bank Account (Account Number D), the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number E), and the new bank account (Account Number F) in the name of the said company with C, and opened three accounts with the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Around 11:50 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim by drinking 10 times the face of the victim on the ground that the injured person was trying to challenge another person on the ground that he/she did not know about another person while drinking together with the victim H ( South and 20 years of age) in a restaurant located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 776"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of a public prosecutor under C;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the police against C or the accused;

1. A petition (I);

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Details of transactions of entry and withdrawal, customer information, and application form for transactions "2016 high time 777";

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. H (W)

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of violence against victims;

1. Article 49 (4) 1, Article 6 (3) 1 (a point of transfer of each access medium) of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of assault) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (only between violations of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions by Means of access);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow