beta
Text
Defendant
A A A with a fine of KRW 10 million, Defendant B with a fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant C with a fine of KRW 1 million.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On November 19, 2010, A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, etc. at the Changwon District Court, and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 27, 2010. On September 13, 2012, the same court was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 7, 2012.
1. Defendant A and H’s joint crime act as the owner of a game room that does not exist in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government I Factory Building. Defendant A and the owner of the game room were recruited to play a role in the management of the game room, exchange, business place, organization of the company, supply of employees, etc. with employees of the above game hall.
Defendant
From August 22, 2010 to March 30 of the same month, A and H set up 22 game machine for “Yamato” game not classified in the above game chapter, 27 game for “Yamato”, and 22 game for “Yaeng”, provided it to unspecified customers, and customers exchanged gift certificates acquired by using the above game machine for cash.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide ungraded game water for use and exchange intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.
2. On August 30, 2010, Defendant B tried to operate an illegal game forum from the above A at an irregular place (hereinafter referred to as Busan) around Busan around August 201, the Defendant paid daily allowances, if regulated, would be subject to a fine, and even if detained, he would be subject to the above gold. After receiving the request, the Defendant prepared a lease agreement under the name of the Defendant as if the Defendant was a business owner, and continued to wait within the game room as stated in paragraph (1) in preparation for crackdown, and on August 30, 2010, the Defendant stated that the control police officer was the business owner at the time of crackdown.
Accordingly, the defendant is running illegal game business as described in Section A(1).