logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.11.22 2018고단1237
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Gwangju District Court's net support on August 1, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on February 1, 2015. On April 9, 2015, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive thereafter. On March 16, 2017, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 21, 2017.

On March 26, 2015, the Defendant had many victims E who wish to have them work in the “C” carpet located in the Mineyang-si B, and who are known to the D Trade Union, including the heads of FD Trade Union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union labor union union labor union labor union

If the introduction cost is KRW 50 million, it will be offered by requesting them to employ the children.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, at the time, the members of the D Trade Union were not employed, and the defendant was not able to have the defendant's children employed as members of the Trade Union's union through the head of the above Trade Union's branch, etc., and even if he received the above money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to use it for the employment of the victims.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was issued five copies of the check in front of the victim’s right of KRW 10 million issued in G on the same day by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (including the case of staff members of the FD trade union, and the case of H’s telephone statement hearing report);

1. A copy of a check before himself;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of the defendant's legal statement, inquiry report, and each copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the Treatment of Concurrent Crimes (as stated in all facts constituting the crime).

arrow