logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.05.14 2018고단1784
사기등
Text

The remainder of the crimes except for the crimes of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras).

Reasons

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

[2018 Highest 1784] On May 30, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “H will share the right to use an Internet lecture (public official short-term schools)” on the bulletin board of the gathering “H,” which was established in the Internet community website, using a mobile phone at the Defendant’s residence located in Hanam-si E apartment F, Hanam-si, and said that “I will inform the victim I who reported and contacted the letter that “I will share the right to use an ID and password so that I can share the right to use the Internet lecture for the Corporation if you send money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not hold the above right to use, and was thought to do gambling on the Internet with the money received from the victim, so that the victim did not have any intention or ability to share the above Internet lectures.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 250,000 won from the time when he was transferred from the victim to the J bank account (K) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and by July 1, 2018, by deceiving the victims seven times in total, such as the statement in the list of crimes 1,850,000 as shown in the attached Table 1, and acquired it by deceiving the victims.

[2018 Godan1919] On July 15, 2018, the Defendant posted on the bulletin board of the gathering, “M,” “M,” which was established on the Internet community website, using a mobile phone at the Defendant’s residence located in Hanam-si E apartment F, Hanam-si, posted a false statement that “M,” “M,” a public official’s right to use an online lecture, will transfer the ID and password to the victim N who reported and contacted, so that he can use the said online account.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the above right to use and thought that he did gambling online with the money received from the victim.

arrow