logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.22 2017가단224602
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9, from among the buildings listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 30, 2013, the Plaintiff acquired ownership of the buildings listed in the separate sheet (attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 99, 6.1 m2, 6.1 m2, 6.1m2) that are unauthorized buildings (attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 7, 9

B. On June 1, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the following terms: (a) the lease deposit of KRW 16 million; (b) the monthly rent of KRW 8.5 million; and (c) the lease term of KRW 16 million; and (b) the lease term of KRW 8.5 million; and (d) the lease term of August 31, 2015 (three months from June 1, 2015 to August 31, 2015, with respect to the portion of (a) the ship connected each point in sequence 1.6 million; and (b) the real estate listed in the attached list.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). C.

The instant lease contract was renewed on a three-month basis, and the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff monthly rent from March 1, 2017.

On June 29, 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the overdue rent of at least three years, and the Defendant received it on June 30, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2-3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement is deemed legally terminated on or around June 30, 2017 by the Plaintiff’s notice of termination, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to return the rent or rent calculated at the rate of KRW 8,500,000 per month from March 1, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.

arrow