logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 12. 03. 선고 2014두41398 판결
부동산을 명의신탁한 사실만으로 사기 기타 부정한 행위에 해당한다고 할 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu40953 (Law No. 19, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2013west 0377 (Law No. 23, 2013)

Title

The mere fact of title trust of real estate cannot be deemed to constitute fraud or other unlawful acts.

Summary

The title trust act alone cannot be deemed as a "Fraud or other unlawful act" if there was a deceptive scheme or other active act that makes it impossible or considerably difficult to impose and collect taxes, or it cannot be deemed as a "Fraud or other unlawful act as an unregistered resale."

Related statutes

The exclusion period of national tax imposition under Article 26-2 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2014Du41398 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

KimA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Seocho Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2014Nu40953 Decided August 19, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow