Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From July 2017 to August 14:00, 201, the Defendants operated a commercial sex acts establishment, i.e., D 201 and D 201 of the Daegu Seo-gu Office of Month E 301, and Defendant B recruited unspecified sex purchases through Internet site “G”. Defendant A sent a commercial sex offender to Defendant B, so that the female sexual traffic is shaking the sexual organ of the male sex purchase. Defendant A arranged commercial sex acts in the way of the rest of the Defendants with 30,000 won by receiving 70,000 won from the male and female purchase, and with the rest of 30,000 won, the Defendants arranged commercial sex acts.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H and I;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each internal investigation report or investigation report (the list Nos. 12,13,20,21,24 of evidence);

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 19(2)1 of the Criminal Act; and Articles 30 and 19 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which provides a suspended sentence (the Defendants)

1. A community service order (the Defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic (the grounds for calculation: The scale of business and the amount of revenue of the defendants in each investigation stage);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the Defendants)’ act of arranging sexual traffic is detrimental to good morals by commercializing sex, and there is a lot of social harm. The Defendants are not likely to lease studio or officetels in multiple ways, publicize it through entertainment sites, and arrange sexual traffic for the business of arranging sexual traffic. This is not the case where the responsibility for the crime is less complicated.

In particular, while engaging in sexual traffic arranged by the defendants, the minor who is a high school student is an adult.