Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are between middle school and Dong-gu.

No one shall arrange, solicit, induce, or compel sexual traffic in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits from many and unspecified persons.

Nevertheless, at around 01:15 on August 5, 2017, the Defendants conspired to engage in commercial sex acts in collusion with each other to guide the customers who promised to engage in commercial sex acts using 50,000 won on the condition that they receive 1.50,000 won for reference F (94years, women, Vietnam) and 60 minutes of sexual intercourse, and arranged commercial sex acts by guiding them to the place designated by another for commercial sex purchase from around 23:00 on August 22, 2017 to 03:00 on August 25, 2017 to 03:00 on the same month for commercial sex purchase to receive 150,000 won in return for commercial sex acts and to enable the said women to engage in commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning mobile phone hosting photographs and field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and the choice of a sentence concerning criminal facts: The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with labor and the choice of a sentence.

1. Defendants of a suspended sentence: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances);

1. Defendants obliged to provide community service or attend lectures: The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic with the reason for the sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, which is not significantly harmful to society, such as the commercialization of sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals; (b) the Defendants continued to commit the crime in the same way at a time as they did not know even after the detection of sexual traffic once by arranging sexual traffic; and (c) the act of arranging

However, there is no same record with Defendant B, Defendant A was the first offender, and Defendants appeared to have an attitude to confession and reflect the instant crime.