logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.29 2015나54109
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

Basic facts are as follows: A and B, who are workers belonging to Thaisan Co., Ltd., were on the D vehicles owned by the said company (hereinafter “instant vehicles”) operated by the said company (hereinafter “instant vehicles”) around 10:00 on July 5, 201, and were destroyed at the front Eup due to the destruction of the instant vehicles due to the collision between the central separation unit and the local separation unit; A suffered bodily injury, such as the instant vehicle’s plehion bar No. 7 pressure, and B, the right 2,3 balance.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant is an insurer who concluded a liability insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle.

The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an industrial accident, and paid A KRW 10,194,450 for temporary layoff benefits, KRW 710,160 for medical care benefits, KRW 16,863,00 for disability benefits, KRW 9,04,70 for temporary layoff benefits, KRW 3,375,250 for medical care benefits, and KRW 24,090 for disability benefits, respectively.

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13, Eul evidence Nos. 2-1 through 10, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by victims pursuant to Article 9 (1) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (hereinafter "the Automobile Accident Compensation Act") and Article 724 of the Commercial Act as an insurer for the vehicle of this case.

The Plaintiff’s right to indemnity has paid temporary layoff benefits, medical care benefits, and disability benefits to A, etc. as above, and thus, pursuant to Article 54(1) of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, the Plaintiff may exercise the right to claim damages against the Defendant A and B, which share the same subject matter of each insurance benefit with each insurance benefit,

(See Supreme Court Decision 96Da39080 delivered on January 24, 1997, etc.). The scope of the Plaintiff’s right to indemnity in relation to damages incurred to A arising from the scope of the victim’s right to indemnity in relation to damages incurred to the victim A is recorded in the attached Form 1 calculation table in addition to the following separate descriptions.

arrow